Location data risk · Updated 2026
WMHMDA Geofencing Ban Explained: What's Prohibited Around Health Facilities
Buried inside the Washington My Health My Data Act is a provision that has nothing to do with privacy policies or consent forms, and everything to do with how your app's location and advertising SDKs behave: the geofencing ban. It's narrow, specific, and — because it was the central allegation in the first WMHMDA class action against Amazon — it's already been tested in court.
In short: RCW 19.373 bans geofencing (~2,000 ft) around health care facilities to identify/track consumers, collect their data, or send related notifications/ads. Third-party ad or location SDKs are the most common unintentional violators. Generate your documents below.
Read the full geofencing explainer
What the law actually says
RCW 19.373 prohibits any regulated entity or small business from implementing a geofence around an entity that provides in-person health care services where the geofence is used to:
- Identify or track a consumer seeking health care services;
- Collect consumer health data from a consumer; or
- Send a notification, message, or advertisement to a consumer related to their consumer health data or health care services.
The statute specifically calls out mental health facilities and reproductive or sexual health facilities as covered health care facility types, in addition to health care facilities more generally.
What counts as a "geofence" here?
A geofence, in this context, is a virtual perimeter defined around a real-world physical location — typically implemented through GPS, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth beacons, or cell-tower triangulation — that triggers an action (like a notification or a data collection event) when a device enters or exits that perimeter. WMHMDA specifically references a geofence of approximately 2,000 feet from a facility providing in-person health care services as within the scope of this restriction.
Why this specific provision matters so much
This is the provision most likely to be violated unintentionally, because it usually isn't your own code that creates the problem — it's a third-party advertising or analytics SDK bundled into your app that you didn't build and may not have fully audited. The Maxwell v. Amazon complaint, filed February 10, 2025, specifically alleged that health-related location data was collected through app location SDKs without proper consent, tied to geofencing around health facilities — making this the first real-world test of exactly this provision. Read the full breakdown in our Amazon WMHMDA lawsuit analysis.
Real-world scenarios that can trigger this ban
- An advertising SDK in your app triggers a push notification to users who spend time within ~2,000 feet of a reproductive health clinic.
- A location-based marketing platform tags devices that visited a mental health treatment center and later serves them retargeted ads.
- An analytics vendor flags "health facility visit" as a behavioral segment and shares that inference with your business or its partners.
- A loyalty or rewards app collects location pings near hospitals or urgent care centers and uses that to infer a health condition for personalization.
Notice that in every scenario, the business running the app may not have written the geofencing logic itself — it lives inside a third-party SDK. That does not remove liability: if you determine the purpose and means of using that location data (for example, by choosing to integrate that SDK and enabling the feature), you can be treated as the regulated entity responsible for the violation.
How to audit your app or site for geofencing risk
- Inventory every third-party SDK with location, advertising, or analytics capability — not just the ones you added yourself, but every transitive dependency.
- Ask each vendor directly whether their SDK implements any geofencing functionality, and if so, whether it can be scoped to exclude health care facility types or disabled entirely.
- Review your own feature set for any location-triggered notification, messaging, or personalization logic, even if it wasn't built with health facilities specifically in mind.
- Document the audit as part of your compliance file — this is exactly the kind of internal record a Data Retention & Disposal Schedule (Document 4 of a complete WMHMDA pack) is meant to capture.
- Disable or reconfigure any feature that could be read as identifying, tracking, or messaging consumers based on proximity to a health care facility.
Geofencing is one line item. A full WMHMDA file needs five documents.
Generate your Consumer Health Data Privacy Policy, Opt-in Consent Form, Sale Authorization, Retention Schedule, and Rights Request Form in ~2 minutes. Read everything free before you pay — $99.99 one-time.
Generate My Compliance Pack — $99.99FAQ
What exactly does the WMHMDA geofencing ban prohibit?
Implementing a geofence around a covered health care facility to identify/track consumers, collect their consumer health data, or send them related notifications, messages, or ads.
Does the geofencing ban apply to my whole app, or just ads near clinics?
It applies broadly — identifying, tracking, and messaging based on proximity to the facility are all covered, not only paid advertising.
What size geofence triggers the WMHMDA ban?
A geofence of roughly 2,000 feet from a facility providing in-person health care services is treated as covered.
Is my location SDK from an advertising partner my responsibility?
Yes — if you determine the purpose and means of using data from that SDK, you can be held responsible even though you didn't write the geofencing code yourself.
What is the wmhmda geo fencing rule (also written "geo-fencing" or "geofence ban")?
It's the provision of RCW 19.373 that bans using geofences around health facilities to track, collect data from, or message consumers about their health status.
Does the geofencing rule only cover reproductive health clinics?
No — it names mental health facilities and reproductive/sexual health facilities specifically, and also covers health care facilities more generally.